Short answer: Yes — in a simple online visual reaction time test, 200 ms is generally considered good and often slightly above average for adults.
Quick answer: what does 200 ms mean?
If your 10-shot average is around 200 ms, you’re typically in the fast range for a simple visual reaction task. The fairest way to compare is to use the same device and track your average over multiple tries.
Jump to:
150 ms vs 200 ms vs 250 ms: what it usually means
People search this because they want a simple interpretation: “Is my number good?” This table gives a practical answer for a simple visual test like Reaction-1.
| Reaction time | How it’s usually interpreted | Most common reasons you see it |
|---|---|---|
| 150–170 ms | Very fast (top range) | Practice + low-latency setup, sometimes anticipation |
| 180–200 ms | Fast / above average | Good focus, consistent device, trained timing |
| 200–250 ms | Typical adult range | Normal baseline, small day-to-day variation |
| 250–300 ms | Still normal for many people | Fatigue, distraction, mobile latency |
| 300+ ms | Slower than typical baseline | Very tired day, multitasking, inconsistent setup |
What counts as a “fast” reaction time?
For a simple online visual task, a fast reaction time is usually under 200 ms when measured as an average, not a single lucky click. If you only have one result, take 10+ tries and use your 10-shot average (your test page already recommends this idea).
Does age change whether 200 ms is good?
Yes — age is one of the strongest predictors of baseline speed. A score that is “average” in one decade can be “excellent” in another. For clear benchmarks, use average reaction time by age.
Is 200 ms good for gamers?
For many gamers, 200 ms is solid. Competitive players sometimes push lower averages, but hardware and settings matter. If you want a harder test that reduces “easy-mode” effects, run Reaction-2 after you set your baseline on Reaction-1.
Is 250 ms reaction time bad?
No. 250 ms is commonly still in the normal adult range, especially on mobile or on a distracted day. The better question is whether you can improve consistency — and yes, you usually can. See can you improve reaction time.
Is 150 ms reaction time realistic?
Yes, but it’s less common as an average. If you repeatedly get extremely low numbers, check for anticipation (clicking “by feel”), and keep your setup stable. To understand what the number actually includes (vision → brain → movement), read how reaction time works.
How to compare your score fairly
- Use the same device (switching phone/PC changes latency).
- Use an average (10-shot average beats one click).
- Test when focused (stress and sleep shift variability).
- Validate with a harder mode (use Reaction-2).
Related reaction-time guides
If you’re exploring reaction speed, these are the most relevant next reads:
Try your own score (free)
Start with Reaction-1, then confirm consistency in Reaction-2.
FAQ
Is 200 ms reaction time good?
Yes — in a simple online visual test, a 200 ms average is typically considered good and often slightly above average for adults.
Is 250 ms reaction time bad?
No. 250 ms is commonly still within a normal adult range, especially on mobile or when tired. Compare averages, not single clicks.
Is 150 ms reaction time realistic?
Yes, but it is less common as a stable average. Consistently very low values can reflect practice, hardware latency, or anticipation effects.
Educational only. Reaction time tests measure simple response speed, not intelligence or medical condition. For fair tracking, use the same device and compare your averages across days.